In practice, however, the AAP-led Delhi government allocated only ₹25 lakh in total, assisting just five students from 2019 to 2023-24. This stark discrepancy reveals that AAP’s focus on Ambedkar’s contributions often appears superficial, as the party fails to implement policies that effectively address structural inequalities or uplift marginalized communities.
Op-Ed by Shubhama Singh
The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), which has consistently portrayed itself as a champion of social justice and governance reform, faces growing criticism over its failure to prioritize representation for marginalized communities, especially Scheduled Castes (SC) and Other Backward Classes (OBCs). Recent resignations, political controversies, and a lack of inclusive representation in both policy and leadership positions have highlighted a significant gap between AAP’s rhetoric and its actions. This gap undermines its claims of inclusive governance and threatens its ability to sustain its voter base among Bahujan communities, who form a critical segment of Delhi’s electorate.
Leadership Crisis and Resignations
The recent resignations of prominent ministers from AAP have shed light on its inability to provide a supportive platform for Bahujan leadership. In October 2022, Rajendra Pal Gautam, then Minister for Social Welfare, SC/ST, and Gurudwara Elections, resigned after participating in a public ceremony where 10,000 individuals converted to Buddhism. The event, inspired by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s legacy, became a point of contention. Gautam faced sharp criticism, with AAP seemingly unwilling to defend his actions or principles. This episode underscored the party’s reluctance to embrace Dalit empowerment when it invites political risk.
Also Read : Ambedkarite Critique of the Kumbh Mela: Caste, Exclusion, and the Politics of Religious Hegemony
The subsequent resignation of Raaj Kumar Anand, who accused the party of being entangled in “the quicksand of corruption,” further deepened the perception of a leadership vacuum for marginalized communities within AAP. Anand’s departure pointed to systemic issues, including the party’s prioritization of political convenience over fostering genuine representation for Bahujan leaders.
Disproportionate Representation in Leadership
One of the most glaring examples of AAP’s shortcomings is the stark underrepresentation of SC and OBC communities in its cabinet and upper leadership. Despite Dalits and backward communities comprising approximately 27.14% of Delhi’s electorate, the current AAP government has failed to include any significant voices from these communities in its decision-making processes. In contrast, the Punjab government under AAP has six SC ministers out of a 16-member cabinet, which aligns more closely with the demographic realities of the state.
This imbalance raises critical questions about AAP’s approach to governance in Delhi. The absence of SC and OBC leaders from the party’s 11 Rajya Sabha members elected from Delhi and Punjab further highlights its failure to integrate marginalized voices at the national level. Without substantial representation, it is difficult for AAP to credibly claim that it understands or prioritizes the aspirations of these communities.
Alienating the Bahujan Voter Base
AAP’s inability to engage meaningfully with SC and OBC communities has broader electoral implications. Dalit voters have historically played a decisive role in Delhi’s politics. By sidelining leaders from these communities, AAP risks alienating a significant portion of its voter base, particularly as other political parties actively court these groups.
The party’s approach to key issues, such as its recent poll promise to provide ₹18,000 to temple priests and granthis of gurdwaras, further complicates its position. While the proposal may appeal to specific religious constituencies, it appears misaligned with the vision of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, who advocated for a secular and inclusive society. This move reflects a populist strategy that risks alienating Dalit voters who may view it as pandering to majoritarian interests at the expense of social justice.
Dr. Ambedkar’s Legacy and AAP’s Claims
AAP often claims to uphold Dr. Ambedkar’s legacy, yet its actions frequently contradict this narrative. While the party regularly invokes Ambedkar’s name in public statements and policies, it has struggled to implement his vision of empowerment for marginalized communities. The absence of Dalit representation within AAP’s leadership starkly contrasts with Ambedkar’s principles of proportional representation and political empowerment for the oppressed.
The recent controversy surrounding the Union Home Minister’s remarks on Ambedkar’s legacy and AAP’s subsequent criticism highlights the party’s inconsistent stance on crucial issues. Ahead of the Delhi assembly elections, AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal announced the Dr. Ambedkar Samman Scholarship, which promised free foreign education for Dalit students. Kejriwal presented the initiative as a response to what he called the BJP’s “disrespect” toward Ambedkar. However, a similar scheme was introduced in 2019, just before the Delhi Assembly elections, under which the Delhi government pledged financial assistance of up to ₹10 lakh for two-year courses and ₹20 lakh for four-year courses, benefiting 100 candidates.
Also Read : “48 घंटे में माफी मांगें केजरीवाल-मान, नहीं तो सख्त कार्रवाई होगी”: प्रवेश वर्मा का अल्टीमेटम
In practice, however, the AAP-led Delhi government allocated only ₹25 lakh in total, assisting just five students from 2019 to 2023-24. This stark discrepancy reveals that AAP’s focus on Ambedkar’s contributions often appears superficial, as the party fails to implement policies that effectively address structural inequalities or uplift marginalized communities.
Policy Gaps and Missed Opportunities
AAP’s governance in Delhi has been marked by notable achievements in areas such as education, healthcare, and public services. However, its policies have often lacked a targeted focus on the needs of SC and OBC communities. Programs aimed at social welfare and economic empowerment have been criticized for being generic rather than addressing the specific challenges faced by these groups.
For example, while commendable, initiatives to improve education and healthcare have not adequately addressed the systemic barriers that marginalized communities face in accessing these services. A more inclusive approach would involve targeted scholarships, skill development programs, and affirmative action policies that prioritize Dalit and OBC communities in line with their proportionate representation in Delhi’s population.
The Way Forward
AAP’s challenges in addressing Dalit representation and empowerment are not insurmountable, but they require a fundamental shift in the party’s approach to governance and leadership. To rebuild trust among marginalized communities, AAP must take the following steps:
1. Increase Representation: AAP must prioritize the inclusion of SC and OBC leaders in its cabinet, legislative bodies, and decision-making processes. Proportional representation is essential to ensure that marginalized communities’ voices are heard and their interests are adequately addressed.
2. Defend Marginalized Voices: AAP must be willing to support and defend leaders from marginalized communities, even when their actions invite political controversy. This includes standing by principles of social justice and rejecting opportunistic compromises that undermine its commitment to inclusivity.
3. Engage with Bahujan Movements: To regain credibility, AAP should actively engage with grassroots organizations, Bahujan leaders, and community representatives to better understand and address the aspirations of marginalized communities.
Also Read : सुशांत सिंह की शिक्षा पर झूठा श्रेय: AAP सरकार की मदद का भ्रम या सच्चाई?, केजरीवाल की खुली पोल
4. Reaffirm Ambedkar’s Vision: AAP should align its policies and governance with the social justice, equality, and empowerment principles espoused by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar. This includes resisting populist measures that cater to majoritarian sentiments at the expense of marginalized groups.
Conclusion
The Aam Aadmi Party’s journey from being a disruptor in Indian politics to a significant political force has been marked by achievements and shortcomings. However, its failure to prioritize Dalit leadership and representation remains a glaring gap in its governance model. If AAP is to remain relevant and credible in the eyes of marginalized communities, it must address these issues with urgency and sincerity. By embracing inclusive governance and championing the aspirations of SC and OBC communities, AAP can strengthen its voter base and uphold its promise of being a party that truly represents the people.
*दलित टाइम्स उन करोड़ो लोगो की आवाज़ है जिन्हें हाशिए पर रखा गया है। *
महिला, दलित और आदिवासियों के मुद्दों पर केंद्रित पत्रकारिता करने और मुख्यधारा की मीडिया में इनका प्रतिनिधित्व करने के लिए हमें आर्थिक सहयोग करें।