“What kind of apology is this? What prevented you from making a sincere apology for your crass comments till now? Sometimes people use docile language only to wriggle out of proceedings, and sometimes they shed crocodile tears. You want to give the impression that the Court had asked you to apologise. We reject your apology—it’s merely a shield from legal liability.”
In a resounding affirmation of constitutional ethics and institutional dignity, the Supreme Court of India on Monday directed the formation of a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe Madhya Pradesh Tribal Affairs Minister Vijay Shah over his derogatory, misogynistic, and communal remarks targeting Colonel Sofia Qureshi, a decorated officer of the Indian Army.
A bench comprising Justices Suryakant and N. Kotiswar Singh ordered the Director General of Police (DGP), Madhya Pradesh, to constitute a three-member SIT of senior IPS officers by 10 AM on Tuesday, ensuring expeditious and unbiased investigation. While the Court stayed the arrest of the Minister temporarily, it underscored that this protection is not immunity from legal scrutiny, asserting plainly: “Consequences will follow.”
Judiciary Calls Bluff on Political Evasion
In an unequivocal rebuke, the Court rejected Shah’s apology, describing it as a calculated attempt to escape legal accountability rather than a sincere expression of remorse. Justice Suryakant minced no words:
“What kind of apology is this? What prevented you from making a sincere apology for your crass comments till now? Sometimes people use docile language only to wriggle out of proceedings, and sometimes they shed crocodile tears. You want to give the impression that the Court had asked you to apologise. We reject your apology—it’s merely a shield from legal liability.”
Also Read : Caste After Conversion: Judicial Divergence on SC Status Across Indian Courts
Uniforms Cannot Be Targeted with Hate
Col. Sofia Qureshi, the officer at the centre of this storm, earned nationwide respect as the face of Operation Sindoor, delivering briefings on Indian Air Force strikes on Pakistani terror infrastructure. Her voice, representing discipline and national duty, was met with derision and communal slander from an elected Minister—an act that has now brought disgrace not only upon him but upon the political machinery that enables such bigotry.
The Supreme Court’s outrage echoed a national sentiment: “The entire nation is ashamed.”
An SIT That Must Deliver, Not Delay
The Court’s directive to form an SIT comprising three impartial IPS officers sends a strong message: criminal misconduct cannot hide behind political privilege. It also places the on-ground accountability in the hands of senior officials, distancing the probe from potential local interference.
This SIT is not merely investigative—it is symbolic of a wider institutional reckoning. The MP High Court had earlier ordered registration of an FIR against Shah under Sections 152, 196(1)(b), and 197(1)(c) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), warning the state police of contempt if they failed to act. Shah has since challenged the suo motu order in the Supreme Court, which will next hear the matter on May 28.
Beyond Apologies: Upholding the Dignity of Women in Uniform
This case is not simply about words spoken by a powerful man—it is about deep-rooted misogyny, communal vilification, and the continued undermining of women in public life, particularly those who wear the uniform and serve the nation.
Also Read : “No Human Should Be Made to Enter a Sewer”: Manual Scavenging, Law, and the Crisis of Caste
Vijay Shah’s statements did not exist in a vacuum. They are part of a broader political culture that mocks merit, targets minorities, and tolerates impunity. Col. Qureshi is not just a soldier—she is a symbol of India’s promise to its citizens: that dignity, respect, and equal opportunity are not the monopoly of the powerful.
The Constitution Must Speak Louder Than Power
The Supreme Court’s actions mark a critical moment of reckoning for Indian democracy. Public office does not come with a free pass to humiliate, degrade, or communalize. When the judiciary intervenes to demand accountability from the powerful, it reminds the nation that constitutional morality cannot be reduced to token apologies or political maneuvering.
As the nation watches, the question is not just whether Vijay Shah will be investigated—but whether India’s institutions will continue to protect those who serve the nation with dignity from those who weaponize hatred.
